Potential AI Errors: A Looming Challenge for Insurers

0

The comparison to "silent cyber" recalls previous instances when insurers faced substantial losses because cyber incidents like ransomware were unintentionally covered by non-cyber policies. Mr. Smith advises that policy proposal and renewal forms should scrutinize the use of AI by asking specific questions about its application and purpose.

While AI is becoming integral to a wide array of professional services, its reliability varies, and errors can lead to significant insurance claims. These concerns mirror those previously seen with cyber risks, and although solutions such as exclusions might deter policyholders, they could also lead to new opportunities for tailored coverage solutions.

The potential vulnerabilities mainly threaten professional indemnity and errors and omissions policies, as errors often remain unnoticed for extended periods, potentially intensifying the impact of claims. Furthermore, directors’ and officers’ policies may also face risks of claims related to intellectual property breaches, defamation, or misuse of personal information.

In the future, the insurance sector might evolve to establish dedicated AI policies, minimizing unforeseen exposures similar to the asbestos precedent, which, despite not receiving any premiums, resulted in substantial costs to insurers. AI remains a pervasive factor within numerous organizations, and any associated errors could lead to significant claims.

In navigating this landscape, insurers are encouraged to proactively address these issues and explore new insurance policy structures to safeguard against unanticipated AI-related claims.

Published:Thursday, 24th Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Potential AI Errors: A Looming Challenge for Insurers 24 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori Industry experts are signaling a potential risk for underwriters due to claims arising from inaccuracies produced by artificial intelligence (AI), likening it to the 'silent cyber' phenomenon of the past. Clyde & Co partner, Darryl Smith, highlights the issue, emphasizing how AI inaccuracies could impact various insurance policies, sometimes without immediate detection. - read more

AFCA Supports RAA Insurance in Vehicle Location Dispute 24 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori An insurance dispute over the location of a vehicle culminated in the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) backing RAA Insurance in their decision to deny a claim. The issue surrounded the policyholder's claim that her son’s car was stored in South Australia, while the vehicle was allegedly used and registered in Victoria. - read more

AFCA Sides with Homeowners in Landmark Insurance Dispute Over Property Cracks 22 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori Homeowners recently secured a favourable ruling against their insurer after a water leak led to significant structural damage. After large cracks emerged on their property, Youi initially denied the insurance claim, attributing the damage to pre-existing issues like earth movement and tree root intrusion, both of which are exclusions in their policy. - read more

Climate Change Threatens Australian Suburbs with Unaffordable Insurance 17 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori More than 4% of Australian properties are currently facing heightened risks from natural hazards exacerbated by climate change, rendering insurance coverage often unaffordable or unavailable, according to recent findings by Climate Valuation. An analysis of over 15 million properties across 15,000 suburbs also highlights that an additional 10% are at moderate risk from disasters such as floods, bushfires, tropical cyclones, coastal inundation, and extreme winds. - read more

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up 16 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank. Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling – supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy – the claim was later denied. This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication. - read more