Insurer Prevails in Dispute Over Misrepresentation of Mental Health

4

The dispute arose when the complainant made a claim on her total and permanent disability (TPD) policy for major depression. In response, MLC (the insurer) decided to amend the policy by adding an exclusion for mental illness, effectively denying the claim.

The insurer argued that it was within its right to add the exclusion because the complainant had misrepresented her mental health history when applying for the policy in March 2015.

Upon reviewing the application form, it was discovered that the complainant failed to disclose her use of anti-depressant medication and provided incorrect answers to questions regarding her mental health.

Misrepresentation of Mental Health

One of the questions on the application form asked whether the complainant had ever experienced or sought advice for anxiety, stress, or sleeplessness. The complainant answered "No," despite having a history of depression and taking medication for it.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that this answer was a misrepresentation.

The complainant also provided a false answer to another question regarding the use of medications in the last five years. Despite her two-year history of depression and recent medication use, she answered "No" to the question.

AFCA concluded that these misrepresentations were significant in the insurer's decision to add the exclusion for mental illness.

Ruling in Favor of the Insurer

The complainant argued that she was unaware of her depression diagnosis and believed her medication was intended to improve her mood, rather than treat depression.

However, AFCA rejected her explanation, noting that she had sought treatment for "anxiety-related condition" and had taken medication to improve her mood.

AFCA ruled in favor of MLC, stating that the insurer demonstrated the intent to add a mental illness exclusion even without the complainant's misrepresentations. The ombudsman also noted that other insurers would have made similar decisions.

Published:Tuesday, 5th Dec 2023
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Asbestos Scare Leaves Hospitality Business Uninsured 04 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The discovery of asbestos-contaminated mulch in a Sydney park led to the cancellation of a festival, resulting in significant financial losses for a hospitality business. Despite these setbacks, the company's claim for coverage under its business interruption (BI) policy was rejected. - read more

Landmark NSW Decision: Dog Walking Costs Covered in Car Crash Injury Claims 03 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a groundbreaking decision by the NSW Personal Injury Commission, an insurer has been directed to cover the costs of dog walking services for a car crash victim. The commission ruled that these services classify as domestic assistance under the state’s Motor Accident Injuries Act. This case could pave the way for broader interpretations of 'attendant care services' for claimants. - read more

Extreme Weather Drives $1.8 Billion in First Half Losses for Australian Insurers 03 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Extreme weather events in Australia have resulted in significant financial impacts for insurers, tallying $1.83 billion in losses during the first half of the year. This comes as insurance companies gear up for further claims linked to ongoing severe weather in New South Wales. - read more

ClearView Names New Underwriting Head Amidst Strategic Changes 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori ASX-listed life insurer ClearView has announced the appointment of Peter Tilocca as Head of Underwriting, coinciding with key updates to its underwriting standards and definitions. Tilocca's extensive two-decade career in Australian underwriting includes leadership roles at Zurich, Noble Oak, One Path Life, and RGA Australia. His new role with ClearView commenced on 30 June. - read more

Ombudsman Supports Theft Claimant in Home Business Coverage Dispute 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent case has seen a policyholder triumph over her insurer after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) ruled in her favour following a contentious dispute regarding home business operations. The controversy arose when the woman's theft claim was denied by her insurance provider, IAG, over allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation about the use of her rental property. - read more