Insurer Held Accountable for Misleading Explanation of Policy to Elderly Traveller
Insurer Held Accountable for Misleading Explanation of Policy to Elderly Traveller
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An elderly gentleman, who submitted a claim on behalf of his injured wife, has successfully resolved his dispute against his insurance company.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority ruled in favor of the complainant, finding that he had been misled into thinking he had coverage.
The claim was initiated after the man's wife had a severe fall down a flight of stairs during their trip to Thailand. She sustained multiple injuries, including a fractured hip and head trauma, which required her to be hospitalized for more than three weeks. Additionally, to ensure a safe journey back to Melbourne, the claimant had to purchase a business class flight for his wife, allowing her to lie flat and minimize the risk of complications.
Zurich Australia denied the claim based on the policy's exclusion of overseas medical expenses for individuals over 80 years old. However, Zurich claimed to have offered an "upgrade" to the policy, providing medical coverage for individuals over 80, which the claimant did not opt for.
The complainant obtained the policy through a local branch of his bank, referred to as CB, which offered it as a benefit for specific credit card holders. At the time of purchasing the policy, both the complainant and his wife were 81 and 80 years old, respectively.
Making an effort to follow the correct procedure given his limited computer skills, Mr. E visited the local CB branch on June 30. He expected the staff to guide him through the application process for the policy.
Mr. E alleged that the CB staff failed to inform him about the need to "upgrade" the policy in order to ensure adequate coverage for medical expenses. He left the bank under the impression that he and his wife were appropriately insured, even receiving an email confirmation from the insurer stating that the policy had been activated.
AFCA considered the claimant's assertion that a bank teller, referred to as SH, had assisted him during the application process. Despite Zurich's objections, the ruling ombudsman agreed with Mr. E's account.
The ruling acknowledged that SH had neglected to disclose the requirement to "upgrade" the policy, necessary for the claimant and his wife to have coverage, despite the bank being aware of their age. It stated that although SH's actions were unintentional, CB caused the insured party to believe they had suitable coverage.
"Given CB's knowledge of the complainants' age, this omission should have been disclosed," AFCA stated.
"SH's oversight significantly contributed to Mr. E's unwitting failure to apply for the policy upgrade. Furthermore, this omission induced Mr. E to enter into an insurance contract that he believed provided adequate coverage. However, unbeknownst to him, the policy was essentially useless in terms of overseas medical expense coverage for both him and Mrs. E."
Zurich argued that CB employees were not authorized representatives and thus were unable to offer any advice on the credit card insurance being offered. However, AFCA dismissed this argument as an attempt by the insurer to absolve itself of CB's shortcomings, stating that the bank acted, at least partially, in the insurer's interest.
The decision mandates that Zurich accept the claim and provides a compensation of $4000 ($2000 for each complainant) for non-financial losses resulting from the insurer's claim denial and subsequent challenges.
"Throughout the claims process, the insurer's stance has unfortunately caused the complainants, particularly Mr. E, to feel accused of dishonesty," expressed AFCA.
"They also feel that their recollections have been questioned. Moreover, the insurer's position in this claim has been based on flimsy evidence."
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Australia’s general insurance sector is facing a proposed step-up in accountability, with the Insurance Council of Australia opening consultation on a new draft General Insurance Code of Practice on 24 June 2026. For truck owners, small fleet operators and transport businesses, the most relevant shift is not just the wording of the code, but the possibility that parts of it could become contractually enforceable for the first time, subject to ASIC approval. - read more
New market data points to a meaningful lift in Australians taking out individual income protection insurance, suggesting more households are reassessing how they would manage financially if illness or injury interrupted their pay. - read more
A recent sanction against an unnamed life insurer has put claims handling back under the spotlight, particularly for Australians who rely on personal insurance as a financial safety net. The Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee found that the insurer failed to request required information from claimants at the earliest available opportunity, contributing to significant delays for some customers waiting on claim decisions. - read more
The Insurance Council of Australia has released a draft General Insurance Code of Practice for feedback, marking a significant step in the industry’s push to strengthen customer protections. Released on 24 June 2026, the draft is open for consultation until 21 July 2026 and is designed to make key obligations legally enforceable through insurance contracts. - read more
A new specialist insurance product for Australian crane and rigging operators is a timely reminder that not every business fits neatly into a standard policy box. ARTes Specialty, working with wholesale provider Mobius Insurance, has launched an integrated crane and rigging policy for the local market, adding to its earlier Australian offerings for commercial loggers and contractors’ plant and equipment. - read more
Life insurance is a crucial part of any comprehensive financial plan, providing peace of mind that your loved ones will be financially secure in the event of your passing. - read more
When it comes to life insurance, a pre-existing condition refers to any medical condition or illness that you have been diagnosed with before applying for a life insurance policy. - read more
The financial fabric of our lives consists of both planning and safeguarding against the unforeseen. Trauma cover, a lesser-known but crucial aspect of personal insurance, provides this protection by offering a lump sum payment upon diagnosis of specific serious illnesses or injuries. In the tapestry of financial planning, it acts as a vital safety net, ensuring that unexpected health crises do not lead to monetary distress. - read more
When you’re young, life is all about new experiences and making plans for a promising future. While factors like travel, career, and relationships often take centre stage, one aspect often overlooked is life insurance. It might seem like something to consider later in life, but starting a policy while you're young can be a savvy financial move. - read more
Welcome to a pivotal guide dedicated to empowering you with the essentials of income protection insurance in Australia. As we navigate through times of uncertainty, safeguarding your financial wellbeing becomes not just a priority, but a necessity. Income protection insurance stands as one of the key pillars of financial security, ensuring a steady flow of income during periods when you're unable to work due to illness or injury. - read more
Start Here !
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!
Knowledgebase
Liability Insurance: A type of insurance that provides protection against claims resulting from injuries and damage to people and/or property.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.