Insurer Held Accountable for Misleading Explanation of Policy to Elderly Traveller
Insurer Held Accountable for Misleading Explanation of Policy to Elderly Traveller
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An elderly gentleman, who submitted a claim on behalf of his injured wife, has successfully resolved his dispute against his insurance company.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority ruled in favor of the complainant, finding that he had been misled into thinking he had coverage.
The claim was initiated after the man's wife had a severe fall down a flight of stairs during their trip to Thailand. She sustained multiple injuries, including a fractured hip and head trauma, which required her to be hospitalized for more than three weeks. Additionally, to ensure a safe journey back to Melbourne, the claimant had to purchase a business class flight for his wife, allowing her to lie flat and minimize the risk of complications.
Zurich Australia denied the claim based on the policy's exclusion of overseas medical expenses for individuals over 80 years old. However, Zurich claimed to have offered an "upgrade" to the policy, providing medical coverage for individuals over 80, which the claimant did not opt for.
The complainant obtained the policy through a local branch of his bank, referred to as CB, which offered it as a benefit for specific credit card holders. At the time of purchasing the policy, both the complainant and his wife were 81 and 80 years old, respectively.
Making an effort to follow the correct procedure given his limited computer skills, Mr. E visited the local CB branch on June 30. He expected the staff to guide him through the application process for the policy.
Mr. E alleged that the CB staff failed to inform him about the need to "upgrade" the policy in order to ensure adequate coverage for medical expenses. He left the bank under the impression that he and his wife were appropriately insured, even receiving an email confirmation from the insurer stating that the policy had been activated.
AFCA considered the claimant's assertion that a bank teller, referred to as SH, had assisted him during the application process. Despite Zurich's objections, the ruling ombudsman agreed with Mr. E's account.
The ruling acknowledged that SH had neglected to disclose the requirement to "upgrade" the policy, necessary for the claimant and his wife to have coverage, despite the bank being aware of their age. It stated that although SH's actions were unintentional, CB caused the insured party to believe they had suitable coverage.
"Given CB's knowledge of the complainants' age, this omission should have been disclosed," AFCA stated.
"SH's oversight significantly contributed to Mr. E's unwitting failure to apply for the policy upgrade. Furthermore, this omission induced Mr. E to enter into an insurance contract that he believed provided adequate coverage. However, unbeknownst to him, the policy was essentially useless in terms of overseas medical expense coverage for both him and Mrs. E."
Zurich argued that CB employees were not authorized representatives and thus were unable to offer any advice on the credit card insurance being offered. However, AFCA dismissed this argument as an attempt by the insurer to absolve itself of CB's shortcomings, stating that the bank acted, at least partially, in the insurer's interest.
The decision mandates that Zurich accept the claim and provides a compensation of $4000 ($2000 for each complainant) for non-financial losses resulting from the insurer's claim denial and subsequent challenges.
"Throughout the claims process, the insurer's stance has unfortunately caused the complainants, particularly Mr. E, to feel accused of dishonesty," expressed AFCA.
"They also feel that their recollections have been questioned. Moreover, the insurer's position in this claim has been based on flimsy evidence."
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
In a landmark decision, Australia's High Court has unanimously ruled that marine insurers cannot limit their liability for wreck removal and pollution clean-up claims. This ruling stems from the case involving Standard Club UK Ltd, the protection and indemnity (P&I) insurer for CSL Australia, following a 2022 collision at the Port of Devonport, Tasmania. - read more
QBE, in collaboration with insurtech firm Aurora, has launched a fully automated underwriting system for Yacht Protection & Indemnity (P&I) insurance. This innovative platform streamlines the underwriting process, handling tasks from broker submissions to policy issuance without manual intervention. - read more
Austal Limited has been awarded a $4 billion contract by the Australian Department of Defence to construct eight Landing Craft Heavy (LCH) vessels. This project, based on the Damen LST100 design, will be executed at Austal's facilities in Henderson, Western Australia, with construction commencing in 2026 and completion expected by 2038. - read more
Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has successfully integrated RACQ Insurance into its 2026 catastrophe reinsurance program. This strategic move is designed to bolster the company's capacity to manage catastrophic events and provide enhanced coverage for Australian policyholders. - read more
Small businesses across Australia are grappling with a significant surge in insurance premiums, with rates escalating by up to 60% since 2019. The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) attributes this sharp increase to outdated liability laws, escalating legal expenses, and cumbersome government regulations. - read more
Life insurance can seem complex at first, but understanding the basics can help demystify this important financial product. At its core, life insurance is a contract between you and an insurer, where the insurer promises to pay a designated beneficiary a sum of money upon your passing, in exchange for premium payments. - read more
Life insurance, a contract between an insurer and a policyholder, is designed to provide financial protection to loved ones in the event of the policyholder's death. For parents, this protection takes on a new level of significance. The birth of a child heralds a profound shift in priorities, with a focus on safeguarding the future of one's family. Hence, understanding life insurance options becomes a crucial aspect of responsible parenting. - read more
The financial fabric of our lives consists of both planning and safeguarding against the unforeseen. Trauma cover, a lesser-known but crucial aspect of personal insurance, provides this protection by offering a lump sum payment upon diagnosis of specific serious illnesses or injuries. In the tapestry of financial planning, it acts as a vital safety net, ensuring that unexpected health crises do not lead to monetary distress. - read more
Life insurance is a crucial part of any comprehensive financial plan, providing peace of mind that your loved ones will be financially secure in the event of your passing. - read more
For many millennials, navigating the complexities of personal finance and future planning can feel like a bewildering journey. Among these financial responsibilities, life insurance emerges as a paramount consideration. More than just a safety net, life insurance can be the cornerstone of a sound financial strategy, providing peace of mind for both the policyholder and their loved ones. - read more
Start Here !
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!
Knowledgebase
Occupational Hazard: A risk associated with the nature of a particular occupation, which may affect insurance premiums.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.