Dispute Over Damages Caused by Violent Painters: Homeowners Unable to Increase Insurer's Offer
Homeowners Lose Battle for Higher Compensation After Painter Attack Damages
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Homeowners claimed damages from contracted painters who damaged their property during a violent attack.
However, they have lost their challenge to increase their insurer's cash settlement offer of $53,000.
After purchasing the house, renovations were ongoing when a group of painters caused damage to several walls and windows in November 2021. The homeowners lodged a claim with IAG, and the male claimant alleged that the workers had "turned on him" during a meeting over workmanship issues and attacked him before causing damage to the property. The painters were later arrested for assault.
Assessment and Offer from IAG
An assessment from an insurer-appointed builder recommended that the matter be handled with a cash settlement, as repairs might not match the existing texture. The scope of works (SOW) for the repairs quoted by the builder was $13,203 in early December. Despite this, the complainants were not satisfied with IAG's offer, and the insurer's requested the builder to revisit the initial quote. AI updated the initial quote, and IAG offered a cash settlement based on the revised quote in April last year, which the homeowners dismissed again.
They had instead obtained a report from a quantity surveyor, referred to as JB, which stated that AI's SOW was insufficient to cover the rectification works and "not a genuine quotation". JB observed that the property had sustained water and ceiling damage, which led to mold growth. The surveyor quoted a repair cost of $120,000 to $130,000.
However, IAG denied responsibility for the mold or water damage and advised that the complainants would have to file a separate claim for the damage to be assessed. In August, IAG offered to increase its cash settlement by 25%, taking its offer to $24,765, which the claimants also rejected.
Builder's Report and Insurance Settlement Offer
The insurer then engaged a building consultant, referred to as CF, to inspect the property and report on the damage. However, the complainants denied them access. But CF provided a desktop report based on an analysis of the various quotes. The consultant estimated that the repair cost amounted to $39,504, which IAG uplifted with a 20% contingency and fees to cover four weeks of temporary accommodation. This led to the insurer’s offer amounting to $53,000.
The homeowners disagreed that the offered settlement was inadequate since it did not consider rectification works for mold damage, which had worsened due to the insurer's delays. However, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that there had been no evidence to show "a causative link" between the malicious damage and water ingress, leading to mold growth.
"Given that the malicious damage involved scratching and gouging to internal walls and a window frame, the panel on balance considers it unlikely any such link exists," AFCA stated.
The panel further revealed that the delays that led to the mold growth could be attributed to the complainants' failure to provide an itemized counter-quote until mid-June last year, more than seven months after the claim had been lodged. If the homeowners wished to have the mold damage covered, they would have to file a separate claim.
AFCA Ruling
The AFCA acknowledged that IAG's offer was "overall reasonable" and required the insurer to waive the $1000 policy excess. The ruling also stated that IAG's offer for temporary accommodation was fair, despite assessments that suggested it would not be required. The homeowners' request for ten months' worth of accommodation, estimated to cost $23,336, was turned down by AFCA.
In summary, the insurer denied a request by complainants for a higher payout over damages caused by violent painters who were also charged with assault in November 2021. This decision was supported by AFCA, which found IAG's offer reasonable and fair, and the homeowners would need to file a separate claim for mold damage.
Published:Wednesday, 31st May 2023 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
Rural Affinity has renewed its partnership with Munich Re Specialty - Global Markets under a new five-year agreement, continuing a collaboration that began in 2006. This renewed alliance aims to support Rural Affinity's efforts to expand its agricultural insurance offerings across Australia and introduce new products leveraging technology and innovation. - read more
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of a truck owner whose insurance claim was initially denied following an engine overheating incident. This decision underscores the complexities surrounding insurance claims related to driver negligence and mechanical failures. - read more
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently upheld an insurer's decision to deny a truck theft claim, citing misrepresentation of the insured's insurance history. This ruling highlights the critical importance of accurate disclosure when obtaining insurance coverage. - read more
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of a freight company in a dispute over the disclosure of transporting dangerous goods. This decision provides valuable insights into the obligations of transport companies regarding insurance disclosures. - read more
Recent findings from PwC's Insurance Banana Skins Survey highlight a concerning trend: Australian insurers are trailing their global counterparts in risk preparedness. The survey, which gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, indicates that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to the global average. - read more
Life insurance can seem complex at first, but understanding the basics can help demystify this important financial product. At its core, life insurance is a contract between you and an insurer, where the insurer promises to pay a designated beneficiary a sum of money upon your passing, in exchange for premium payments. - read more
Choosing the right life insurance policy is one of the most important decisions for Australians, especially for those who are middle-aged or older. Life insurance provides financial security for your loved ones in the event of your passing, ensuring that they are not burdened with financial hardships. - read more
For many millennials, navigating the complexities of personal finance and future planning can feel like a bewildering journey. Among these financial responsibilities, life insurance emerges as a paramount consideration. More than just a safety net, life insurance can be the cornerstone of a sound financial strategy, providing peace of mind for both the policyholder and their loved ones. - read more
Life insurance and estate planning are critical components of financial security. They ensure that your loved ones are protected financially when you are no longer around. By understanding these tools, you can take significant steps to secure your family's future. - read more
Life insurance is a fundamental component of a robust financial plan, yet its significance is often underestimated. It serves as a safety net, ensuring that your loved ones are financially secure in the event of your absence. Understanding life insurance is the first step towards safeguarding your family’s future. - read more
Start Here !
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!
Knowledgebase
Exclusion: Specific conditions or circumstances for which the insurance policy does not provide coverage.
